The bigger message in the big numbers.
Functionary Newsletter November 10
View in browser

Past editions  |  To sign up.  |   To make sure you see the emails, add functionary@irpp.org to your contacts. 
Hit reply for any delivery questions. 
~ Evangeline, editor & troubleshooter.

The Functionary is written by Kathryn May.

 

Hi all, 

Now it comes down to the public service. The budget’s numbers are big. But the message is bigger.

 

If the Carney government wants to build more, house more, defend more, and make Canada competitive and productive, it has to become something it hasn’t been in over a decade: smaller, faster, and simpler.

 

The economic ambitions of the budget will rely on implementation by a public service that has long struggled with delivery. State capacity was the Trudeau-era’s Achilles heel. This government can’t afford the same stumble.

Reductions compared

And yet the public service now has to absorb 40,000 job cuts, $60 billion in savings, and deliver a national rebuild on top of it. The challenge isn’t just the cuts. If the system can't keep up as public servants try to do more with less, they know the government is willing to sidestep it and set up new agencies to get stuff done. 

 

 

So, let’s dig in.

 

Today:

“Take a few risks.”: One of Michael Sabia’s marching orders.

Heed the signals: Streamline. Simplify. Nod if you understand.

Rule reduction: The internal rulebook is getting a makeover.

Incentive to go: Suddenly, a chance to retire early with no penalty.

From the outside in: 50 private-sector leaders will be brought in.

Pensions: Indexation for all, a mystery fixed, and “25 and out” for the frontline.

The storm quietly brewing: The government wants arbitration changes.

 

THE RESET
Retooling, remixing and a signal
The budget demands execution, not reinvention, from the public service. It’s a reset of priorities and delivery expectations — not a full-blown government transformation.

 

Governance expert David McLaughlin notes in his must-read Public Servants Get a Big Beautiful Budget that governments never reform and modernize until the economy forces them to – and then they downsize. He calls it a rightsizing, a  “measured reckoning” that's long overdue.  

 

The reset repositions the federal government, retools the public service, remixes the workforce, shifts from social to economic investments, and sets a new balance between capital and operational spending — with new agencies emerging as engines of Carney’s agenda. It pushes for productivity and efficiency — and even signals a new relationship with its unions.

 

Execution will determine whether it becomes truly transformative. That’s the test ahead.

Champagne applause

François-Philippe Champagne (left) soaks in the applause with Mark Carney as he delivers the federal budget in the House of Commons. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

 

This budget was big, just not as big as many expected. After weeks of talk about layoffs and ballooning deficits, there was almost a sigh of relief in some public-service circles.

 

The early-retirement incentive is a kind of gift, a way to trim payroll voluntarily and avoid waves of layoffs. House leader and Gatineau MP Steven MacKinnon is convinced the people impact of the cuts will be “very minimal.” MacKinnon sits on cabinet’s government transformation and efficiency committee.

 

The budget doesn’t explain how the public service is supposed to get smaller, faster, or simpler. But the expectation is it can do all three while absorbing cuts and delivering the biggest economic agenda in a generation.

    PS growth

     

    Michael Sabia, clerk of the Privy Council, acknowledged the scale of the cuts in his day-after letter to employees: “I am not going to try to diminish those consequences. They are real.”

     

    But Sabia also delivered the marching orders the budget didn’t spell out:

    “The government has defined its priorities. Our job is to relentlessly focus on them… simplify so that we can move faster… take a few risks to get things done… and act with a sense of personal accountability to deliver the results the country needs.”

     

    LEADERSHIP SIGNALS
    Take it as permission to simplify
    Small things can be transformative, says Allen Sutherland, president of the Institute on Governance. Such as: the steady signals Carney and Sabia send about not letting process or the “web of rules” get in the way. Streamline. Simplify.

     

    “If there is some transformation in the public service day to day — where public servants act with more commitment to implementation and less focus on simply being rule followers — then I’d say that’s very transformative.”

     

    In short, leadership signals can drive change and behaviour across the public service.

     

    For Michael Wernick, who once sat in Sabia’s chair as clerk, the budget falls short on real transformation. It has aspirational reforms, but none of the legislative fixes, structural pruning, or deep investment in public-service capacity needed.

     

    For Sahir Khan, the budget is like a solid mid-term grade. But “the final mark will depend entirely on execution — and that burden falls squarely on the public service,” says Khan, vice president at OttawaU’s Institute of Fiscal Studies and Democracy.

     

    One senior bureaucrat summed it up: Carney’s approach isn’t about transforming the institution or rethinking its principles. It’s pragmatic: the public service is being reshaped by being told to deliver on priorities.

     

    “That’s the Carney transformation. You don’t waste time on a grand plan. You set aspirational goals and tell them to get it done.”

     

    Another added: “The government isn’t focused on institutional theory but on practical, delivery-focused fixes. Carney isn’t interested in changing the public service to be different — he’s interested in it changing to deliver something he wants done differently. The focus is on results.”

     

    This approach of skipping grand plans is concentrating attention and decision-making in the PMO and PCO on departments tied to top priorities. Some bureaucrats worry that political staff will jump in to fill gaps if public servants can’t move fast enough. That would blur accountability. It also raises questions about whether departments not directly tied to top priorities are getting enough attention.

     

    Generational investments

     

    Let’s take a look at how the government is trying to move faster with fewer people.

     

    Parallel machinery, faster track. It’s not lost on public servants that a growing share of Carney’s big-ticket priorities are being driven by brand-new agencies outside traditional departments. There’s the new Major Projects Office, Build Canada Homes, the Defence Investment Agency — and  whatever form the newly announced Office of Digital Transformation ultimately takes.

     

    “As you look at all the new things they’re doing, it doesn’t involve the public service, said one long-time senior bureaucrat. “Most of the money is bypassing departments. It’s like: 'sure, get things done — but get out of the way.' ”

     

    Less red tape for the rulebook. The government is taking another go at the web of rules that bogs down government. It wants a simpler internal rulebook, freeing time, speeding up approvals, and shifting focus from process to results.

     

    A series of legislative amendments will cut unnecessary reports, outdated laws, and approvals that slow things down. Departments will get more freedom to make decisions at the right level, align rules across government, and operate faster and more efficiently. Full details will land in Budget 2026.

     

    “I’ll go.” The attrition game-changer. The Early Retirement Incentive allows eligible public servants to retire early with no penalty, bridging them into retirement while helping to reduce layoffs.

     

    A year and a half ago, about 31 per cent of federal public servants were 50 or older. That’s the ERI target group for the retirement incentive. Among executives, more than half are over 50. About 650 executive jobs will disappear with expenditure review savings and the government wants to reduce about 1,000 all told over two years.

     

    The big risk: a wave of departures could leave big leadership and experience gaps. And that’s just when management and consulting services are being cut by 20 per cent over three years so more work is done internally, theoretically empowering public servants to take on more responsibility and accountability. That’s the reasoning.

     

    The budget earmarks $1.5 billion for the early-retirement incentive, drawn from the surplus that’s been piling up in the public-service pension plan. No estimates yet on how many people could take it. Packages will start rolling out in January or as soon as the legislation passes. But the window is short: one year.

     

    For context:

     

    Total federal public service: 367,772 employees.
    30.8 per cent: age 50+ 

     

    Executives: 9,155 of them:
    ~50.4 per cent: age 50+ 
    28 per cent: age 50 to 54
    16.2 per cent: age 55 to 59
    4.9 per cent: age 60 to 64
    1.3 per cent: age 65 plus+

    Source: Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat

     

    Here come the outsiders. To offset some of this, the government is rebranding Interchange Canada as the Build Canada Exchange, bringing in 50 private-sector leaders in tech, finance, and science to inject fresh ideas, skills, and outside experience. The program uses flexible salary arrangements to bypass pay caps. signaling that this push is about delivery and execution.

     

    Historically, private-sector executives are a tough fit. They face a steep learning curve: navigating government processes and a culture defined by risk aversion, slow decisions, and high scrutiny.

     

    PENSIONS
    Cost, cuts and corrections
    Pensions are public servants’ most prized asset and the government’s second-biggest liability after federal debt. They got an unusual amount of attention in this budget, some of it even aimed at reining in costs. (Remember, the PS pension surplus is covering the cost of the early-retirement incentive.)

     

    Inflation indexation for one and all. The government says pension indexation for military, RCMP and public-service pension plans will now be consistent with consumer inflation (CPI). Pensions for DND and the RCMP, as well as disability pensions run by Veterans Affairs, have been indexed to the CPI or wage inflation, whichever is higher. Starting in January 2027, everyone’s will be aligned with CPI. That fix saves a staggering $5.8 billion over four years.

     

    Finally, an alignment for the mysterious missing adjustment. Remember that PBO report about the mystery of the missing pension adjustment we wrote about? To recap: When the CPP and QPP were enhanced in 2019, no one updated the public-service pension plan to reflect those changes. So, for years, both employees and the government have been contributing more than necessary for the same level of pension benefits.

     

    It caught Finance’s attention and the budget fixes it.

     

    The outcome:

    • Public servants save up to $1,100 a year in pension contributions with no change to their benefits.
    • The government saves $1.1 billion over four years, then $384 million ongoing, from lower employer contributions.

    How often does that happen? Public servants save and taxpayers save!

     

    And public-safety workers get their “25 and out.” Frontline public-safety employees — from border officers to firefighters, search-and-rescue teams, and parliamentary protection officers — will soon be able to retire with full pensions after 25 years of service, the long-awaited “25 and out.” Border officers have led the push for this change for years, and the Liberals promised it more than a year ago.

    union leaders 900 px

    Federal union leaders at a press conference held in response to the spending cuts. From left: Larry Rousseau, VP at the Canadian Labour Congress; Sharon DeSousa, PSAC president; Alex Silas, PSAC vice-president; Sean O’Reilly, PIPSC president; Nathan Prier, CAPE president; and Vivian Funk, a vice-president at the Association of Justice Counsel.

     

    And, finally, one to watch.

     

    ARBITRATION
    The sleeper battleground
    Unions are already up in arms over 40,000 job cuts, claiming they jeopardize services Canadians rely on. But labour leaders and their lawyers quietly went
    on full alert over proposed changes to the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act.

     

    Those changes would reshape arbitration.

     

    Arbitrators would have to weigh the government’s fiscal position and its ability to recruit and retain talent when deciding labour disputes. Unions say it would stack the deck for the government. Interestingly, this mirrors the very language of the Harper government’s Bill C-4, which the Trudeau government repealed.

     

    Details will be spelled out in the upcoming legislation to implement the budget, and unions are always ready to go to court on any perceived infringement to collective bargaining rights

    -:-:-:-

    On a scale of zero to 10, how did you find today's edition? 

     

    Want to sign up?

    Kathryn May

    A bit about me. I write The Functionary as part of my work covering and analyzing the federal public service for Policy Options, where I am the Accenture Fellow on the Future of the Public Service. I've been reporting on the public service for more than two decades, covering parliamentary affairs and politics for the Ottawa Citizen and iPolitics. My work has been recognized with a National Newspaper Award and a Canadian Online Publishing Award. 

     

    Report an error 

    LinkedIn
    X

    The Functionary is published by Policy Options, the news site of the IRPP.

    Institut de recherche en politiques publiques, 1470, rue Peel, bureau 200, Montréal, Québec, H3A 1T1, Canada, 514-985-2461


    Unsubscribe    Manage preferences